Dramatically cure the sudden sensorineural hearing loss that medicine has abandoned (2 reports)
Fujita MD Nakayoshi-cl.Hirai Edogawa-ku Tokyo Japan
The red line is the audiogram after treatment with a previous doctor. The blue line is the audiogram after treatment at our hospital. Numbers are average hearing at 250 Hz, 500 Hz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz, 4 kHz.
Case 1.11 year old Female She was admitted to the university hospital the next day after onset. She got a steroid infusion treatment for a week, but she almost did not recover.
Case 2. 18 years old Male He was admitted to the university hospital from the fourth day onset. He got a steroid infusion treatment for a week, but he almost did not recover.
THERAPY: superior cervical ganglion block(SCGB) 2-3 times / week + Gokaji
RESULTS: We have dramatically improved severe and intractable idiopathic hearing loss (SSHL) which was rare in university hospitals.
This report is a treatment report of severe and refractory cases which did not improve in the university hospital. These are not mild cases. I have been treating with reflexive SSLH specialized in SCGB. I have numerous achievements to recover refractory SSLH by superior cervical ganglion block alone, but I can not expect such a drastic improvement. This is because I have never experienced a recovery of more than 60 db with SCGB alone. Therefore, I conclude that Gokaji contributes to the recovery of more than 60 db. Treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss includes intratympanic injection, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, stellate ganglionic block, acupuncture. However, in those treatments, I think it is difficult to recover more than 60 db of highly refractory diseases that will not cure at university hospitals. We should not hide the fact that intractable SSHL can be dramatically restored to such a degree with Gokaji combined SCGB.
Long-term regenerative treatment of sudden deafness
sudden sensorinueral hearing loss (SSHL) is a complaint called “1/3 is a natural healing, 1/3 is not cured at all, 1/3 is a sequelae.” In current medicine it is said that there is no effective treatment, and treatment is generally done only with steroid medication in general. Treatment is usually censored in approximately one month after onset. Many otologists believe that treatment for more than a month is useless.
We are treating SSHL and giving long-term results of treatment to overturn common sense of present medical science. We report four cases of miracles that have been hearing improved for more than 5 months by combination therapy of superior cervical ganglion block and Gokaji.
Case 1. Eleven months have passed since onset. Currently still under treatment. The middle and low frequency range continues to improve.
Case 2. Interruption of treatment in 5 months from onset. The middle range continued to improve.
Case 3. Interruption of treatment in 5 months from onset. The patient regenerated from a state that it can not be heard at all.
Case 4. Ended 9.5 months after onset. Except for 8 kHz, it is close to complete recovery.
Remarks: In case 4, she was sentenced to the attending physician as “Hearing can not continue to improve, so you are lying or mental abnormality (hysteria)”.
Regenerative medicine for hearing loss
Such long-term hearing improvement is effectively regenerative medicine. It is impossible to continue improving for a long time unless the auditory nerve, hair cells, nerve cells of the inner ear nucleus and the like regenerate. It seems that there is power to prompt regeneration in either the superior cervical ganglion block or Gokaji. Therefore, we compared long-term improvement effect of superior cervical ganglion block monotherapy group and Gokaji combined treatment group. As a result, long-term improvement (more than 2 months) was found significant (p = 0.0076, <0.01) in Gokaji combined group.
|*||SCGB alone group||Gokaji combination group|
|Long term improvement||1||6|
Long term = 2 months or more
Detailed document is here (Japanese)
Conclusion: Gokaji has the effect of regenerating nerve cells.
Addendum: This is an announcement overturning common sense of medicine. I do not think it should be denied by saying “I do not believe” because it is not a report.
Cure healing unexpected sudden deafness 2017
Fujita MD Nakayoshi-cl.Hirai Edogawa-ku Tokyo Japan
120 patients with initial visit with Sudden sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSHL) in 2017
All cases were diagnosed with previous doctor (otolaryngology) and had been treated with steroids
Twenty-four patients (20.0%) visited within 1 week after onset
After more than one week visit 96 cases (80.0%)
Onset – initial visit days are 29.2 days on average
Since our hospital is a second opinion clinic, patients visit after an average of 29.2 days since onset. The Golden Hour of treatment of SSHL is said to be within 2 weeks from onset. However, 60% of the patients who visit from 2 weeks have passed. The majority of patients will be visited in a medically late state.
Motivation for visiting our hospital
118 patients (98.3%) in 120 patients came to our hospital because “Improvement was poor even if they were treated with a previous doctor”. It is confirmed that almost all cases are refractory SSHL.
Of the 120 patients, 98 cases excluding 22 cases (17 cases of 1 time interruption, 5 cases of 2 times discontinuation) where treatment was discontinued selfishly are examined for the outcome of treatment.
superior cervical ganglion block(SCGB) with 2% lidocaine 1 cc
done under ultrasound diagnostic equipment
• Cure: 9 cases, Excellent: 19 cases, Fair: 39 cases, Good: 6 cases
• Invalid 25 cases (of which 4 cases of improvement, 9 cases of partial improvement)
Cure: Within 20 db of the whole area
Excellent: (500 Hz + 1 k × 2 + 2 k × 2 + 4 k) / 6 improved more than 20 db
Fair: (500 Hz + 1 k × 2 + 2 k × 2 + 4 k) / 6 improved by 10 db or more
Good: (500 Hz + 1 k × 2 + 2 k × 2 + 4 k) / 6 Improve by 5 db or more
To my clinic, 98.3% will have no treatment effect by the previous doctor, or people with less effect will come. In other words, the patients at our hospital are limited to SSHL people who are almost confirmed to be refractory in modern medicine. The above treatment outcome is not merely the treatment result of SSHL but the treatment result of “refractory SSHL which the hospital had abandoned”. Treatment results with only refractory disease, 73 out of 98 improvements are far beyond the treatment level of modern medicine.
The power of miracles to validate disabled cases
Since October 2017 we started to add Healing by my wife to the treatment of SSHL. We compared the outcome of treatment between the group not performing healing and the group performing it. In the Healing combination group, the number of ineffective cases was reduced (p = 0.0076).Click here for details(Japanese).
SSHL does not improve even if the treatment is too late using the superior cervical ganglion block. However, using the superior cervical ganglion block and healing, it turned out that even invalid cases could be used as valid examples. We strongly recommend using Healing with SSHL “I will not cure what I do”.